enquirer.com

Reds
Front Page
Game Log
Schedule
Big Red

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
AP Wire

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
TV Listings
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

The Cincinnati Reds
What are Reds really worth?
Schott's price likely too high

Sunday, December 13, 1998

BY GEOFF HOBSON and JOHN ERARDI
The Cincinnati Enquirer

[schott]
Marge Schott
The way Marge Schott sees it, the Cincinnati Reds are worth about $215 million.

Major League Baseball has appraised the club at $130 million. Forbes magazine says it is worth $136 million, while two other experts say it is closer to $160 million.

So just how much are the Reds really worth?

Ultimately, the Reds will be worth whatever someone is willing to pay for them. But there isn't an appraiser, evaluator or economist who thinks the Reds are worth what Mrs. Schott is asking.

Mrs. Schott is the president and chief executive officer of the Reds.

The high-end value for the Reds today is $160 million, a value placed on them last week by sports consultant Marc Ganis and Andrew Zimbalist, author of Baseball and Billions, who is also a Smith College (Mass.) economics professor.

Mr. Zimbalist believes the value could climb above $200 million once a lease is signed for a new stadium and there is a clear indication the ballpark would fit nicely between Cinergy Field and the Crown - and can draw almost 3 million fans a year. The Reds have drawn just under 2 million the last five seasons.

"The value of $150 million to $160 million (for the Reds franchise) is a good value today," Mr. Zimbalist said.

"I might come in higher, but there are too many uncertainties about the stadium plan four years in the future. . . . If some of the stadium issues are cleared up, I think the team could be worth over $200 million."

The way franchises are valued is not dissimilar from how residential properties are priced. What have homes of similar size and amenities on your street recently sold for?

In baseball, amenities can be huge: the $50 million per year the Yankees TV contract generates, or the luxury suites at Jacobs Field in Cleveland that bring the Indians $10 million more annually than the Reds get at Cinergy Field.

What is a franchise's ability to generate ticket, concession and parking revenue? How much of it does the franchise get to keep? What is the size of the player payroll? How much is owed in deferred salary payments? What are the expenses of operating a front office, a farm system and a scouting network?

All these elements are factored in, Mr. Zimbalist says.

Cincinnati is in the undernourished third world of baseball economics, experts maintain, without the mega-millions of local TV and radio revenue flowing through Baseball's big markets.

That's why the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Yankees are appraised in the $400 million to $600 million range, experts say.

It is also the reason Mrs. Schott isn't likely to get the $78 million selling price she seeks for 3.5 of her limited-partnership shares and both of her general-partnership shares, which carry with them the power to run the franchise for the next two years.

At Mrs. Schott's $78 million asking price, the entire franchise would be valued at $215 million.

At a value of $160 million, the value placed on the franchise by Mr. Ganis and Mr. Zimbalist, Mrs. Schott's 3.5 limited-partnership shares and two controlling shares would be worth only $62.45 million - well below her asking price.

Here's how that value is determined:

  • A franchise value of $160 million makes each of the Reds' 15 limited partnership shares worth $10.7 million. Mrs. Schott is selling 3.5 of her limited shares. That's $37.45 million.

  • Some industry analysts put a 17 percent premium on Mrs. Schott's two general-partnership shares. That would make Mrs. Schott's two general partnership shares worth $25 million.

  • Total value for her limited and general-partnership shares then is $62.45 million.

That's right in the neighborhood of where her friend, Northern Kentucky developer Jerry Carroll, pegged it two weeks ago.

He described Mrs. Schott as a "reluctant seller."

"She's ready to move on, but she's going to do it at her price," Mr. Carroll said.

He values the 5.5 shares Mrs. Schott has on the block at $60 million, plus a little more.

"Because she's reluctant, she'll need a bonus," he said.

Reportedly, the highest offer Mrs. Schott has received for her shares so far is $45 million. That's $33 million less than what she's asking. But if one were to split the difference between $45 million and $78 million, the selling price would be $61.5 million - right about where Mr. Zimbalist and Mr. Carroll place it.

Sources say Mrs. Schott has had inquiries locally and nationally, with the leading candidates Cincinnati businessman William O. DeWitt Jr., and other local investors who are part of Mr. DeWitt's ownership of the St. Louis Cardinals. Jon Ledecky, the Washington, D.C. businessman who tried to buy one share of the Reds last fall, is reportedly also interested.

National and local business observers believe Mrs. Schott hasn't been flooded with offers because her limited partners have the right to match any bid. They predict any prospective buyer must craft a deal through the core partnership group of Cincinnati businessmen Carl Lindner and George Strike, Wall Street investor and Northern Kentucky native Bill Reik, and Cincinnati philanthropist Louise Nippert.

Major League Baseball thinks Mrs. Schott plans to sell before the Reds partnership expires on Dec. 31, 2000. Some insiders envision a compromise price of $55-60 million.

That might be a bit too low for Mrs. Schott, however.

A source close to Mrs. Schott has told The Cincinnati Enquirer she's looking at options in which she could sue MLB for devaluing her investment by forcing her to sell.

But MLB argues it isn't forcing a sale. MLB has the power to suspend Mrs. Schott for the next two seasons because of her use of Reds' employees names in an alleged scheme to defraud General Motors at one of her auto dealerships.

Dean Bonham, head of a Denver-based marketing firm for sports and entertainment franchises, advised Mrs. Schott should sell her controlling interest before it expires.

"You have to figure lost dollars and not what the price might be down the road," Mr. Bonham said. "You may lose $10 (million) to $20 million because you weren't able to deliver the controlling interest as part of the package. But it's an interesting dilemma for her, because the value of these franchises rises about 12 to 14 percent per annum."

On Oct. 23, Mrs. Schott agreed to let John Allen continue to run the team until Dec. 31, 1998, while she entertained bids. MLB is expected to ask her soon to extend the agreement.

Indications are if she doesn't, Mrs. Schott will be called into a hearing with MLB Commissioner Bud Selig regarding the GM question.

Mariners interested in Sanders
Brown's $105M deal distresses small-market teams
Larkin trade will take work
Lewis gladly rejoins Reds
Perez out, Thompson in
Reds page


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Web access | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.